document research basis for phase plans
This commit is contained in:
parent
eaa22de302
commit
412c8b8af9
19 changed files with 332 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,23 @@ Plan future calibration of smart-flow confidence, policy thresholds, penalties,
|
|||
|
||||
The architecture should leave room for calibration, but calibration should not block the MVP. The system first needs clean facts, evidence, hypotheses, and replayable evaluation before tuning can be meaningful.
|
||||
|
||||
## Source documents
|
||||
|
||||
- Architecture plan: [`docs/plans/smart-flow-architecture-review.md`](../../plans/smart-flow-architecture-review.md)
|
||||
- Research report: [`docs/research-docs/smart-flow-market-mechanics.md`](../../research-docs/smart-flow-market-mechanics.md)
|
||||
|
||||
These documents are rationale, not added scope. This future phase is the place to turn research ideas into scoped calibration work after MVP.
|
||||
|
||||
## Research basis
|
||||
|
||||
- Historical validation should be time-of-day aware and avoid lookahead bias.
|
||||
- Baselines for "unusual" should account for ticker, tenor bucket, regime, and event-day exclusions.
|
||||
- Confidence, penalties, abstention, and alternatives need versioned policy outputs so calibration stays auditable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deferred research ideas
|
||||
|
||||
- ML scoring, learned calibration, richer catalyst feeds, and large historical benchmark suites require separate future Beads scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies on earlier phases
|
||||
|
||||
- `islandflow-zxh.5` - Smart-flow API/UI explainability
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue